The 50th Anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s Decision
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when governor-general Sir John Kerr legitimately exercised a constitutional power to resolve a deep political deadlock and ensure the Crown received funds necessary for government operations. Despite this, Kerr has faced relentless criticism both during his life and posthumously.
Clarifying Kerr’s Role
It is important to state clearly that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government; that was the will of the Australian people. Kerr merely provided the opportunity for that outcome, which was a consequence rather than his primary intention.
Anticipated Reactions to the Anniversary
This anniversary was expected to revive criticism of Sir John Kerr. However, the response has been even broader:
- A new biography of former Prime Minister Whitlam
- A documentary aired on Sky News Australia
- A day-long event organized by the Museum of Australian Democracy and streamed live from Old Parliament House
The Day-Long Event Details
The event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features notable participants including journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, and academic Professor Jenny Hocking—all known for their opposition to Kerr. Most participants lean towards the Labor side, signaling a partisan tone.
"For that Sir John has been mercilessly pilloried up to and beyond the grave."
"Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so. And more importantly, that was a by-product of – not the motivation for – his decision."
"You can imagine the sound and fury that will engulf the parliamentary triangle on this otherwise sacred day."
Despite the partisan narratives and ongoing controversy, Kerr's decision remains a critical moment in Australia's political history.
Summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s constitutional intervention attracts renewed partisan debate, though his action fundamentally enabled the Australian people’s political will.